Wayzata School District: Property Tax Public Hearing Planned December 4

January 23rd, 2008 by admin

Wayzata School District: Property Tax Public Hearing Planned December 4

A public hearing has been planned to discuss the current budget of Wayzata Public Schools and the amount of property taxes the district is proposing to collect in 2008 to pay for the costs of the district for the 2008-09 school year. The hearing is planned Tuesday, December 4 at 7 p.m. in the district administration building located at 210 County Road 101 North in Plymouth. All residents of the district are invited to attend the public hearing and express their opinions on the current budget and on the proposed 2008 property tax amount.

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Real Estate Credit Crunch

January 23rd, 2008 by admin

The credit crunch and subprime meltdown have created affordable ownership opportunities for the middle class, says condo developer and entrepreneur Mario Costanz of NYCAffordableLiving.com. New studio and one-bedroom condos at Zinfandel Condominium are now available.

Brooklyn, NY (PRWEB) December 4, 2007 — The current credit crunch and subprime meltdown have created affordable ownership opportunities for the middle class in NYC. Affordable one-bedroom and studio condos at Zinfandel Condominium in Crown Heights can now be found at NYCAffordableLiving.com.

News Image

Nationwide, real estate prices declined for most of 2007, primarily because of delinquencies in mortgages made over the past four years to subprime and no income verification borrowers. Increased foreclosures combined with tightening mortgage underwriting standards have drastically increased the inventory of homes currently on the market. In addition, this past summer?s mortgage meltdown has made securing a Jumbo mortgage (one larger than the conforming loan limit of $417,000) much more difficult.

?Since New York City real estate prices are in many cases higher than $417,000, sales have lagged due to buyers having difficulty qualifying for Jumbo mortgages,? says condo developer and entrepreneur Mario Costanz of NYCAffordableLiving.com. ?All of these factors have contributed to the bubble finally bursting and affordable living making a comeback.?

Smart developers in the NYC real estate market have stopped over building million dollar houses in middle class areas and are instead developing affordable condos throughout the boroughs. Studio to three-bedroom apartments can now be bought from the high 100,000?s to the mid 300,000?s. Some condos, such as Zinfandel Condominium, are gut renovation conversions of apartment buildings, while others are ground up new construction, like 580-586 Van Siclen Avenue Condominium in East New York. Many developers who were building three-family houses throughout the city have decided to convert the complexes into condominiums because the three families weren?t selling. It is more profitable for the developers and more affordable for the end buyers.

For example, a one-bedroom condo at Zinfandel Condominium is priced at $237,000 which is actually cheaper than renting a similar apartment when income tax deductions are taken into account. Renting a one-bedroom with hardwood floors, granite countertops, stainless steel appliances, a video intercom system, recessed lighting and Internet connections prewired in the walls can easily run upwards of $1,200 to $1,400 a month in Crown Heights. Owning the condo can cost as little as $1,060 per month with the tax advantages and only 5 percent (approximately $12,000) out of pocket.

With the recent slowdown in the real estate market combined with many people who recently lost their homes to foreclosure entering the renters market, rents are dramatically increasing as the citywide demand for apartments increases.

?We are so thrilled to be able to offer this opportunity to the young professionals and middle class workers of New York City,? Costanz says. ?Owning instead of renting is the first step towards financial freedom. Renting only gives your landlord a mortgage interest tax deduction and you a rent increase each year. Plus, real estate will appreciate over time, so it is a great long term investment.?

http://realty.blogforward.com/news/1612/condos-in-nyc-an-affordable-real-estate-alternative-says-nycaffordablelivingcom.html

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Housing Crisis - in effort to pay taxes and costs rentals on market - rental pricing depression

January 23rd, 2008 by admin

“Unable or unwilling to sell their homes at declining prices, homeowners in Riverside and San Bernardino counties are converting them to rentals, glutting the market and causing rents to fall for the first time in years, according to Inland property managers. There are so many Inland homes for sale, that even if no more come on the market, it will take more than two years to sell the houses available, according to the California Association of Realtors.”

“John Denver, owner of Perris-based John Denver Realty, said most will take a financial loss as landlords, because the monthly mortgage payments are greater than the rent they can get. Bill Santoro, owner of a rental management company with properties throughout most of Riverside County, said the monthly shortfall averages $500. Denver said he is seeing some landlords taking monthly losses of as much as $1,000.”

“‘It is a good time to be a renter and a lousy time to become a landlord,’ said Denver.”

“Denver said today a $300,000 house purchased with a 7 percent down payment would likely require a monthly mortgage payment of $2,500. The same house, he said, can be rented for $1,300 a month, ‘and the owner has to do the repairs.’”

“Rob Dunn, a commercial construction manager, said that a year ago he noticed construction work was slowing in California and took a job in Denver. He and his wife put up for sale the five-bedroom, 3,600-square-foot house that they had bought four years earlier in the Victoria Grove community of Riverside.”

“He said they initially priced the house at $50,000 below market and between December and June they dropped their asking price from $700,000 to $620,000. There were no takers.”

“‘It wasn’t a matter of what your price was. Nobody was looking,’ Dunn said. Finally, in June, they got their first offer. But it was contingent on the buyers selling their own house in Orange County, which didn’t happen.”

“So 11 months after putting the Riverside house up for sale, the Dunns, who have already moved to Colorado, found tenants to rent their Riverside house for $1,975 a month, or about $500 a month less than the mortgage payment.”

“The Dunns’ real estate agent said a year ago the same house would have leased for $2,100 a month.”

“Dunn said the cost of keeping the Riverside house has put the family in a financial bind. They have bought a much smaller house in Denver, rarely eat out and have no money for golf, skiing or health club memberships.”

“‘We haven’t been to a movie since January,’ he said, and his wife worked over the Thanksgiving holiday to help make ends meet.”

“Kevin O’Neill, director of property management for ReMax All Stars Realty in Riverside, said that office lowered rents by 5 percent to 10 percent in the last 90 days to be more competitive.”

“Rich Merlin, owner of Inland Empire Property Management, which handles rental houses in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, said he has begun to offer a half month of free rent on his listings.”

“He said the rental market typically follows the for-sale market in down cycles. He recalled that during the recession of the mid-1990s landlords similarly were forced to use incentives.”

“The dying landscapes are sprinkled across every neighborhood in Murrieta. Some of the backyards have stagnant pools. Others have shattered windows.”

“‘These foreclosures have created a phenomenon,’ said Mayor Doug McAllister. ‘They always created an issue, but this time it’s worse. We don’t want these dead lawns and stagnant pools creating even bigger problems.’”

“Murrieta is joining a growing list of Inland-area municipalities trying to deal with foreclosed homes by targeting the banks or financial institutions that take over the properties. The city of Riverside passed a blight ordinance last week.”

“‘Banks need to maintain property just like everyone else,’ said Riverside Councilman Frank Schiavone. ‘They can’t just sit vacant and go to hell and let the neighborhood go to hell.’”

“‘The need for new legislation often arises from poor moral choices,’ Murrieta Councilwoman Kelly Bennett said. ‘This is the result of irresponsible homeowners, including lenders, who weren’t paying attention to what their choices can do to a community.’”

“Doug Leeper, Chula Vista code enforcement manager, said this cycle of foreclosures is different from those in the 1990s. He said this time people are moving out before lenders actually foreclose on a home. In the past, authorities usually had to force out the homeowners.”

“Chula Vista has 800 lender-owner properties in foreclosure. Some are marked by dead lawns. Others, often with million-dollar price tags, have stagnant pools and wide-open doors.”

“Leeper said most banks have worked with the city. But some national lenders have balked or even threatened lawsuits. ‘They think we are overstepping our boundaries,’ he said. ‘I just tell them, ‘OK you have your lawyers, we have ours.’”

“A lot of homes had lenders that flipped loans, so the names on the title reports are often outdated.”

“‘We call the lender and they tell us they sold it to another mortgage company,’ he said. ‘You finally reach that company and they tell you they sold it two weeks ago. They aren’t required to record that with the county recorder. Some of these loans have been sold four times.’”

The Bakersfield Californian. “The east Bakersfield streets bordering Martin Luther King Jr. Park are the metro area’s ground zero for subprime lending between 2004 and 2006. In 2006, 40 percent of home loan dollars that originated in Kern carried high interest rates.”

“Homeowner Isabel Shaff lives across the street from an empty, bank-owned home. Her area is already poor and rundown, she said. She worries that more foreclosures could make things worse.”

“‘I know this thing has just barely started,’ Shaff said.”

“At a recent foreclosure-prevention seminar organized by the credit union, Randy Petersen, VP of Kern Schools Federal Credit Union, was struck by sky-high rates some borrowers paid on home mortgages.”

“As prices escalated during the real estate boom, he said, many bought out of fear they might be unable to afford a home later. ‘There were lenders that made it possible to get in with little or nothing down,’ Petersen said. ‘And they charged the points or interest rates commensurate with that risk.’”

The Modesto Bee. “Like a great white shark lurking beyond a sunny, sandy beach, the first installment of this year’s property taxes looms amid the holiday decorating and shopping. The deadline is Dec. 10.”

“The deadline is a nonevent for renters and those homeowners who have an escrow account for the tax. Less than half of the property taxes in the county come from escrow accounts held by mortgage companies, said Stanislaus County Treasurer and Tax Collector Gordon Ford. And those who handle their own tax bills are getting some extra nudging from mortgage holders this year.”

“With the high level of home foreclosures in the past year, lenders are finding themselves stuck with delinquent property tax bills when they repossess a home.”

“‘One of the bigger changes we are seeing is lenders squeezing people to make sure they are current on the property tax,’ Ford said. ‘Mortgage companies don’t want to be caught behind on taxes.’”

“About 6.6 percent of the county’s property owners were delinquent at the end of the last fiscal year, Ford said. That’s higher than it has been in past years, probably because of the high number of home foreclosures, he said.”

“In 2003, at the height of the real estate boom, the delinquency rate was 1.7 percent, according to Ford. It was around 2.5 percent in 2004 and 2005, rose to 3.4 percent in 2006 and nearly doubled for 2007.”

“Stanislaus County doesn’t foreclose on properties for delinquent taxes until they are five years in arrears, Ford said. ‘If they are a year or two late, it doesn’t disturb us,’ he said. ‘We collect with interest later.’ And penalties.”

The San Mateo Daily Journal. “Home prices in San Mateo County have dropped slightly from an average of $975,000 to a little more than $900,000. ‘We’ve seen some slowdown. We are watching [transfer tax] on a monthly basis. If we find it goes down consecutively for a few months then we’ll be concerned,’ said Hossein Golestan, finance director for the city of San Mateo.”

“Foreclosures are up 28 percent and the volume of homes on the market is down 30 to 35 percent, said Jeff Craighead, president of the San Mateo County Association of Realtors. ‘There is still plenty of money out there, you just have to qualify for it,’ Craighead said.”

“Meanwhile, homes are becoming harder to sell.”

“The county Assessor’s Office usually releases preliminary assessed property values at the end of January. Any downward adjustment in assessed property values could signal to finance directors that it is time to tighten the city’s budget. ‘It’s wait-and-see,’ said Redwood City Finance Director Brian Ponty ‘We’re not seeing the robust increases we’ve seen in the past.’.”

The County Sun. “The Inland Empire is ground zero for the housing meltdown. But you’d never know it by looking at a new federal program that seems to slight California homeowners.”

“Figures provided by the Federal Housing Administration show that California homeowners make up only 3 percent of total loans offered nationwide under a new bailout program designed to help them avoid foreclosures.”

“Inland Empire borrowers make up just under 1 percent, in an area that reports the third-biggest number of foreclosures in the nation. Experts say California’s higher- than-average loan amounts confound the issue.”

“‘We have people calling, but when you look at what their real income is and what their debts are, it doesn’t pencil out,’ said Will Herring, a local mortgage broker and board member of the California Association of Mortgage Brokers, Inland Empire Chapter. ‘They don’t conform to FHA guidelines.’”

“So far, 290 subprime borrowers - 13 of them in default - throughout San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties have secured refinancing through the program.”

“Herring said one of the program’s guidelines recommends borrowers have a debt-to-income ratio no higher than 43 percent, which is shutting the door on several consumers. Most inquiries he receives are by homeowners who originally stated they had a 50 or 60 percent debt-to-income ratio when they applied for their subprime mortgages.”

“Jerry Mayer, program support director at the FHA’s field office in Santa Ana, said that number couldn’t be broken down by county because of computer glitches. ‘If I had to make an educated guess, then I’d say that 80 percent are in the Inland Empire,’ he said.”

The Daily Breeze. “Its figurative hat in hand, California went to the feds hoping for some help in coping with the worsening housing market.”

“And Tuesday, the feds brushed that request aside. James B. Lockhart, director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, said the conforming loan limit for the continental U.S. will remain at $417,000 in 2008 - the level it’s been since 2006.”

“Despite falling prices, the Realtors association reported that just 24 percent of households could afford to buy an entry-level home in California during the third quarter, unchanged from a year ago.”

“In California, an ‘entry-level’ home costs $482,910, the association said. A family would need an annual income of $99,590 to buy it with 10 percent down, and an adjustable interest rate loan of 6.56 percent.”

“The High Desert, which includes the Antelope Valley and is being hit hard by foreclosure, is also the most affordable area in the state. Here, 48 percent of households could afford the entry level house, 10 percentage points better than a year ago.”

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Bankf Of Montreal will Pay Land Transfer Tax : Soften Tax Grab

January 18th, 2008 by admin

t’s an offer many may not be able to refuse. The Bank of Montreal is offering to pay the new Toronto land transfer tax for customers who use the financial giant to arrange a mortgage.The city of Toronto voted in the controversial new levy in October, after months of delay. It was the focus of bitter acrimony, because it would increase the cost of owning a home for first time buyers by thousands of dollars. It kicks in during the New Year, forcing many to hurry their decision about whether they can really afford a residence.

But now the BMO is offering to cover the cost of the new tax up to 1.5% of the mortgage on five year fixed terms. Buy a property worth $400,000 after February 1st and the bank will help pay off the $3,700-plus the city will ding you for. Get a property worth $300,000 and the institution will cover the whole thing.

“It’s important that Toronto homeowners don’t feel pressured into making a purchase decision based on this new tax,” avers BMO V.P. Cid Palacio in a statement.

Like most things involved with money and taxes there is one catch. The offer is only good until February 29, 2008, giving harried homebuyers some extra breathing room to work out their finances.

It’s the latest salvo in a war for your business. Last September, the CIBC announced it was going to be opening select branches in Toronto on a Sunday for those who needed help from tellers and couldn’t do their normal banking via the ABM. TD-Canada Trust responded by extending its own hours on Saturdays.

It’s good news overall for consumers, the only ones who don’t go by so-called ‘banker’s hours.’

But… everything is not always as it seems…

Fact: BMO will rebate upto 1.5% for the Toronto Land Transfer Tax provided the client takes a 5 year fixed rate at 6.35%.

Fact: Client does not have an option for a variable product

Fact: On a $300,000 mortgage the 0.46% premium results in paying approximately $6,800 more in interest over today’s best rate of 5.89% and after the rebate of $3,725 still pays $3,175 more over the term

Fact: If you don’t go to full term, the rebate gets CLAWED BACK

Be informed, understand the program and advise your clients it is not in their best interests to take advantage of this program.

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Real Estate Boom has Appeal Outside the USA

January 18th, 2008 by admin

For real estate investors, global markets look brighter than those in the U.S. today. International property prices caught fire three or four years ago, at a time when it wasn’t easy for individuals to buy in. Today you can. There are at least 16 retail mutual funds and three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) trained mainly on Europe, Asia and Latin America. Some of them include U.S. properties, others don’t. In the U.S., the funds own shares principally in real estate investment trusts, or REITs, especially equity REITs that operate various types of commercial property — office buildings, hotels, malls, apartment houses, industrial warehouses and so on. REITs or REIT-like structures are now developing in other countries, too, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore and the U.K. Where REITs don’t exist, the funds buy shares of operating real estate companies.

As diversifiers, REITs and real-estate companies land somewhere between bonds and stocks, providing steady rental income combined with capital gains if the properties rise in value. Often, real estate does well when other parts of the market sag.

Global diversification lowers your risk even more, by exposing you to more than one interest-rate or real-estate cycle. While the U.S. office market appears to be going soft, booming global trade is driving up property prices in international port cities and financial centers.

Broader Market

Private equity is there already. So far this year, 101 real-estate funds have raised $63.9 billion, according to London-based Preqin, a private-equity consultant. Less than half of that money went into the U.S. The rest was divided roughly equally between Europe and the rest of the world.

Internationally, the groundwork is being laid for a much broader, publicly traded property market, says Samuel Lieber, head of the Alpine International Real Estate Equity Fund. “In 1989, we were hard pressed to invest in 16 countries,” he says. “Now we’re invested in 28 and looking to invest in 35.”

Lieber singles out Brazil as “potentially the most interesting market in the world.” It’s newly developing a public real estate market, 30-year mortgages are now available and demand for real estate is strong.

Cohen & Steers, a long-time real-estate specialist, currently offers three funds — Asia Pacific Realty Shares, International Realty Fund and Global Realty Shares (formerly a U.S. fund that went global in September). Senior Vice President Scott Crowe sees good value in the U.K., a market where real estate stocks trade at substantial discounts. Prices dropped 15 percent (in British pounds) in the first half of 2007, to levels that seem worth buying. He finds prices compelling in continental Europe, too.

Asia Leads

Absolute growth will be higher in Asia, he says, but stock prices are high, too. Roaring growth can’t be sustained in those markets if the rest of the world slows down.

Charles Schwab’s Global Real Estate Fund launched in May. David Siopack, co-portfolio manager of the fund, says that global investment truly became viable only in the past three years, as more countries developed REIT structures and private operating companies started going public.

Siopack loves Singapore — a high-growth city state, strategically placed, with the world’s busiest port. Its property index jumped 10.2 percent in the second quarter of 2007 while most markets sank. He also likes Hong Kong (up 7.7 percent) and office properties in central Tokyo. Overall, Japanese property prices dropped 6.8 percent in the second quarter, but he sees central Tokyo as “like midtown Manhattan,” with rising demand for limited space.

Watch Costs

Looking further afield, he’s interested in apartments and office properties in western Canada, where growth is driven by oil-field development.

As usual, you need to watch your expenses when buying a fund. Cohen & Steers is among the priciest, with 1.65 percent in annual costs plus an upfront sales load of 4.5 percent. No-load funds dispense with sales commissions and pare annual costs. For example, Schwab Global Real Estate Fund charges 1.2 percent a year; Alpine costs 1.17 percent; Fidelity International Real Estate costs 0.96 percent.

For the names of more global and international funds, check http://www.investinreits.com .

ETFs include the WisdomTree International Real Estate Fund, and three index funds: Barclays iShares S&P World ex-US Property Index Fund, First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Index Fund and State Street’s SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate. In this niche, however, managers generally outperform the indexes, according to Mike Kirby, director of research at Green Street Advisors, specialists in REIT consulting.

Taxing Consequences

Your ETF or fund receives dividends from the companies it invests in and passes them on to you. Dividends received from REITs are taxed in your ordinary income bracket. Dividends from other real estate stocks normally get the 15 percent capital- gains rate. Qualified foreign taxes paid are passed through to U.S. investors as tax credits.

U.S. real estate still matters, for its income and relative stability. For investors seeking moderate risk, Ibbotson Associates suggests putting 23.3 percent of your equity into real estate stocks, with the following allocation: 12.1 percent in North America, 7.8 percent in Europe and 3.4 percent in Asia. Raise the Asia percentage, if you’re up for higher risks

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_quinn&sid=aT0ncGSAsm0E

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Preparation Leads to Financial Freedom

January 17th, 2008 by admin

Besides your credit score and the other five qualifications you must meet to finance a real estate mortgage loan, you need to gather papers and documents. Speed up your financing and make your life easier. Organize your papers into a three-ring binder or file system. You wont need all of the documentation listed below. However, the more information you gather, the more likely you will be to get the best loan rates. Keep in mind that all of these documents may not be needed for all types of loans.Documentation Required for Real Estate Mortgage Loan

Whether you want to buy your first home or many investment properties to build wealth, this checklist will help you save money on loan costs.

1. Proof of Income

Include copies of your last two pay stubs or other proof of employment and income verification. If you are receiving fixed income like trust income or social security, then include the beneficiary letter stating how much you get.

For self-employed, you will need to prove that you have been in the same line of work or business for two or more years.

If self-employed, show a copy of your business license for two or three years to show you have been in that business for at least two years. If you dont have these, then show whatever you do have to evidence you have been in business for at least two years in the same line or business field. You may also ask a CPA to amend your income tax returns for the previous two years and then write a letter verifying that youve been self-employed for at least two years.

2. Tax returns

Provide tax returns for the last two years or at least the last two years of W2s and/or 1099s if you dont want to disclose tax returns.

If youre self-employed, the mortgage company may require your personal and business tax returns for the previous two years and your companys year-to-date Profit and Loss Statement. If you own a business, you may need a Financial Business Statement prepared by an accountant.

3. Bank account records

Gather your account numbers, address of your bank branch, along with checking and savings account statements for the previous two-to-twelve months. You only need the last two months bank statements in most cases. Most lenders will only need twelve months bank statements when you are trying to get a “full doc” loan (with the best rates) instead of stated income for a self-employed individual. Talk to your loan officer about whether twelve months of bank statements will help you get a better rate.

Include all bank accounts, savings accounts, retirement accounts, and investment accounts. Include any account that you sign for, even if your spouse also signs on the account, and even if your spouse does not apply for the loan with you. Financial assets like these are considered important by lenders as a reserve, particularly now that property values are not rising as quickly.

4. Driver’s license and social security card photocopies

5. Proof of housing payments

Whether you own or rent, you must document your housing payments. Credit reporting agencies list mortgage payments. Provide copies of your mortgage statements or a copy of your lease agreement with twelve months of checks showing rent payments on time.

If you rent your home from a professional management firm, they can verify that you have paid rent on time. If you rent from a private party, most lenders (though not all) will require you to show canceled rent checks for twelve months.

6. Major assets (other real estate owned, automobiles, boats, antiques, stocks, etc.).

You dont have to include individual stocks if you own shares in a mutual fund or hedge fund. Just provide the latest fund statement. Include vested cash value of whole-life or universal life insurance policy, if any. (Cash value is not the same as the face value. Cash value is what you would get from the insurance company right now, if you surrendered the policy while still alive.) If there are antiques or other collectibles, provide only the total collection value; you dont have to itemize.

7. List of debts (car loans, furniture loans, student loans, and credit cards)

Even though the debts will be on the credit report, you must be aware of all of your debts so that you can tell if the credit report has mistakes. Include any debts that you have co-signed for, like when you co-sign for a childs car.

8. Divorce settlement papers, if applicable, no matter how far back in time

9. Delinquent or inaccurate debts or credit report items

If you paid a collection, judgment or lien (especially a tax lien or other lien against your house), include proof of payment.

10. An irrevocable gift letter if you are receiving a monetary gift from a relative.

11. Purchase agreement (for new purchase).

Provide a copy signed by both parties, including all the signed disclosures.

12. Items needed for a refinance

Furnish copies of your note and deed of trust, home insurance declaration page, copy of your last property tax bill.

13. If you own investment real estate in your name, you need rental leases for each of your properties, plus the items listed in #12 for each of your properties.

14. Bankruptcy

Supply all pages and schedules for any bankruptcy filing within the last seven years, and the discharge sheet, for any type of bankruptcy (Ch 7, Ch 11 or Ch 13). Bankruptcy must be discharged before the date of the loan application.

Preparation Leads to Financial Freedom

Talk to your loan officer to see which documents you need to copy and send. Prepare your credit and your real estate mortgage loan documents so you can buy your dream home and even multiple investment properties.

Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry

Winnipeg Used Volkswagen Passat

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Toronto imposes new Land Transfer Tax - What does this means to home buyers?

January 17th, 2008 by admin

Toronto imposes new Land Transfer Tax - What does this means to home buyers?

- After much debate for months and months, here is the new Toronto Land Transfer Tax that was just passed by Council on 22 October 2007 and takes effect on 1 February 2008. Transactions entered into prior to the end of the year will be fully exempt whenever they close. For the first two months of the year, the deals must close before February 1st 2008. After that, the full tax applies. The new tax is an addition to the existing land transfer tax. The extra tax is payable on residential and commercial property purchases, including vacant land. So how will this affect the real estate market in Toronto an surrounding areas?

EXISTING Ontario Land Transfer Tax:

Land transfer taxes are levied on properties that are changing hands, are the responsibility of the purchaser. Current tax rates (effective from June 1, 1989)

* 0.5% of the value of consideration for the transfer up to and including $55,000,
* 1% of the value of the consideration which exceeds $55,000 up to and including $250,000, and
* 1.5% of the value of the consideration which exceeds $250,000, and
* 2% of the amount by which the value of the consideration exceeds $400,000 for land that contains at least one and not more than two single family residences.

ADDITIONAL NEW Land Transfer Tax :

New tax rates (on purchase agreements signed after Dec 31, 2007 and close after Feb 1, 2008).

* 0.5% on first $55,000,
* 1% on next $345,000, and
* 2% on portion over $400,000

Examples of new Land Transfer Tax ($)
Home Price Ontario LTT Toronto LTT Total LTT
250,000 2,225 2,225 4,450
350,000 3,725 3,225 6,950
450,000 5,475 4,725 10,200
500,000 6,475 5,725 12,200

For first time purchasers: A rebate of up to $3,725 will apply to first-time purchasers of both new and existing homes. This means a full rebate for first-time buyers of homes valued at $400,000 or less. For example, a first-time purchaser of a home valued at $600,000 would pay land transfer tax according to the scale shown above, and receive a rebate of $3,725. A first time home buyer of a home valued at $300,000 would get a full rebate on the land transfer tax.

Why Toronto imposed new land transfer tax?

City of Toronto’s projected revenue shortfall for 2008 budget is approximately $415 million. The city will be able to raise additional $155 million by Land Transfer tax and another $20 million by the new Toronto Vehicle ownership tax. That means a revenue shortfall of perhaps $239 million for next year’s budget. This may translate into new taxes on property, alcohol, road tolls, entertainment, parking, billboards, etc.

Toronto is the ONLY jurisdiction with two home buying taxes, highest land transfer taxes in Canada and the second highest in North America.

What may happen now?

A second land transfer tax (LTT) on top of current provincial LTT, is almost 100% increase which might slow down real estate activity for short period of time only.

Home buyers will have less money for down payment, furniture, appliances or renovations. This could ultimately cost over $15,000 for an average buyer when coupled with other real estate closing costs and goods that follow home’s purchase. First-time buyers will not get affected as they will NOT pay the City’s new land transfer tax on first $400,000 of their property’s price.

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Is Your Property Tax Assessment High ?

January 17th, 2008 by admin

When you receive your property tax bill, you need to go over it very closely. You need to look at the fair market value and the assessed value. These two different things have two different meaning when figuring your property tax liability. Many people have complaints about how the assessment of homes or properties is done. The county assessor does not enter your home or property, they look at the outside for a description of the property to compare to other similar properties in the area to determine your assessed value. This is common practice and may not always be the true assessed value of your property.

Now this assessed value does not take into consideration bad roofs, cracking interior walls, bad foundations, windows that are falling apart or anything else wrong with the house. They also do not see if you have done any repairs or behind the scenes remodeling so to say. All the assessor sees is the outside of the property. If you know your assessed value is outrageous because of deteriorating conditions, you can appeal the property tax assessed value. You would do this to have the assessed value of the home lowered, thus reducing your overall tax liability.

If your home is assessed at $100,000 and you need a new roof, which includes trusses and some structural preservation that is going to cost $50,000, then you might think the assessed value of your property is over exaggerated. If this has happened to you, you can seek a property tax lawyer or a consultant to give you some advice on the appeals process. You do not want to pay taxes on a property that is half of the assessed value than what it should be at this specific time. If you wait until the next year, it may be to late to have anything done.

You need to take some steps to protect yourself when filing an appeal of property taxes, which a lawyer can point out to you. If you property is in that much need of repair, the city may deem it necessary to condemn the property until repairs are made. This is all a part of the system. If your repairs are not life threatening, but more so they lower the value of the property, then a property tax lawyer can argue this point for you.

You can see how important it is to check your property tax bill to see exactly what is said about your property. Many people just get the bill and pay it without really giving it any thought. If you go to sell the property and find out that the assessed value is to high and you are selling for less than that, you will find out, you have been paying taxes that are exaggerated.

At this time, you have no recourse to recoup any of that money. It is better to check the bill and decide if you feel comfortable about the new assessed value of your property.

http://www.globalfinanceworld.com/tax/property-tax/is-your-property-tax-assessment-outrageous/

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Tax Will Not Make it Easier for Economy

January 17th, 2008 by admin

IT might not the most sexy of subjects admittedly but it is keeping the property community awake at nights.

It has profound implications for the wider business community who carry surplus space, business bosses should take note because it’s a tax coming to your empty unit soon, April 1, 2008 to be precise.

In the 2007 Budget Gordon Brown announced the abolition of relief for business rates on vacant commercial property.

Currently empty industrial, warehouse and distribution property do not pay business rates. All other empty commercial property has a 50% relief rate.

This will raise something over £1bn of additional tax revenue per annum. There are winners – charities will have a zero rating along with amateur sports clubs under the proposals.

The Conservatives appear to have dropped their opposition to this proposal so it is more than likely to be passed in 2008.

The unconvincing fig leaf the Government has applied is that will bring back into use under- utilised property and make property more affordable.

The Department of Communities and Local Government in its consultation document Modernising Of Empty Property Relief wishes to see office rents in the UK reduce as they are one of the highest in the world.

This description reflects the West End and City of London markets, not the reality in Wales. They also wish to see a fairer system.

We must have missed the sustained outcry from the public, livid that industrial buildings are exempt from rates on empty buildings.

There has been little opposition to the existing system. They also wish to see the protection of greenfields from new development – what about brownfield regeneration, the tax also applies here.

The policy for hundreds of thousands of new homes that will have to be built partly on the greenbelt is at odds with this desire.

This tax extension does not fix a market failure or remedy a perceived inequity. The evidence is that there are certainly more units available than occupiers in South Wales with vacancy rates running at 12% or higher on industrial property.

Available floorspace is increasing to about 14 million sq ft. Market rentals reflect this fact, taxing the empty space will not improve take up.

Who would want to deliberately hold a vacant property? Landlords see vacancies as an unwelcome interim before leasing their unit.

Companies who have surplus space are trying to dispose of it. There are other significant bills attributable to void property such as insurance, security, utilities and maintenance.

Unless there is a very specific reason for keeping property vacant, it does not make sense.

So what are the implications of business rate modernisation? To start with business will be reviewing its assets to see where it can reduce exposure.

For those businesses who are struggling it is another burden, for those companies looking to expand including inward investors, another reason for caution.

It could also depress property values making investment in new property development less attractive. The problems in the American housing market have already led to a steep drop in UK commercial property values due to increasing lending rates and negative investor sentiment to property.

Appraisals for speculative schemes will carry additional costs, the “void period” post completion is already uncertain but now more costly. Schemes may now become unviable or delayed.

Property companies in Wales have reacted positively to a market that no longer requires large manufacturing bases of which there are disproportionately many in Wales, witness NEG in Cardiff, Sony in Bridgend and LG in Newport.

They have addressed the modern demand for higher value and smaller units – it has been a success story. The risk of acquiring massive vacant buildings for ambitious schemes is now greater. The dynamism of regeneration and redevelopment will be slower and harder to achieve.

Demolition (permitted) will be encouraged probably leading to drops in tax revenue over the medium term. Less favoured locations will likely see more of this.

The Wales Assembly Government has rightly created initiatives to see more business property in disadvantaged locations. This will now be less attractive to developers as the time taken to lease property is usually longer.

It is a tax within the remit of WAG. Interestingly the Scots have decided to stick with status quo. WAG has an opportunity to make Wales a comparatively more attractive place to invest in than the English regions – all the signs are that it is not going to take it.

CBI Wales and RICS Wales have lobbied WAG to consider concessions to the proposals or an extended grace period to allow transition.

The modernisation of empty property relief appears a victimless and faceless tax. It does however have underlying consequences. A tax on regeneration is perhaps overstating it but it will not make it any easier for our economy to compete.

http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/business-in-wales/commercial-property-wales/2007/11/21/faceless-tax-won-t-make-it-easier-for-economy-to-compete-91466-20137179/

Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry

Winnipeg Used Volkswagen Passat

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Large Property Tax Increases

January 17th, 2008 by admin

Lower Makefield residents are bracing for the highest township property tax increase in 17 years.

At Wednesday night’s meeting, the township supervisors are expected to pass a 2008 budget with an increase of 2 mills, or about $80 for a resident with a property assessed at the township average of $40,000.

Some of the reasons for the proposed increase are a 4 percent salary increase for employees next year, a 7.8 percent increase in health insurance costs, a drop in the money the township gets from the realty transfer tax and the addition of three new police officers for 2008, said township Manager Terry Fedorchak.

At the Dec. 5 meeting, police Chief Ken Coluzzi said the additional officers are sorely needed. The township has a total force of 34, including 23 patrol officers, much too small for the township’s population of 33,000, said Coluzzi.

There are .68 patrol officers for every 1,000 residents, way below the northeast United States average of 1.8 for municipalities with populations below 100,000, he added. Also, the township has gotten bigger and busier, with the number of police calls going from 9,626 in 2000 to 12,601 in 2006, Coluzzi said.

“There was a study done in 1995 that projected we should have 39 total police officers in 2004, and we’re still well short of that,” he said. “On many shifts now, we have only three officers patrolling the entire township, and that is not a good situation.”

After going through police academy and inter-department training, the three new officers will probably not be ready to start normal patrols until sometime after June of next year, said Coluzzi. They will start at annual salaries of $42,000, he added.

In addition to the three new officers, someone will be hired to make up for the retirement of Detective Sgt. Henry O’Brien, who is stepping down Jan. 15. While there is a good chance he will be replaced from within, that still causes a staff decrease somewhere down in the ranks that must be made up for with another hire, said Coluzzi.

The personnel situation also will be helped when patrol officer Todd Hamski returns from a deployment in Iraq with the Air Force Reserve. That isn’t expected to happen until at least the middle of next year, Coluzzi said.

Fedorchak said he’s working through the weekend to find $100,000 more in cuts, but that won’t result in lessening the tax increase. It will allow the township to only achieve the recommended surplus of $465,000 in the general fund by the end of next year. That’s about 5 percent of the total 2008 general fund amount of $9.3 million, with 5 percent being the “safe harbor” recommended by auditors as a hedge against emergencies, Fedorchak said.

Money from the realty transfer tax, funds the township gets when properties are sold, have decreased from $1.9 million in 2005 to a projected $1.45 million next year, he said.

“That’s a significant drop in a very important source of revenue,” said Fedorchak.

Despite the explanations, township resident Bob Slaman was alarmed by the proposed tax increase. He criticized township officials for paying about $5,000 to $6,000 more a year in electricity costs to get 10 percent of its power from wind. The supervisors have said it’s worth it to set an environmental example.

“That’s an abuse of taxpayer money,” Slaman said. “They also spend too much money on consultants, like the one on Edgewood Village. This is great big [tax] increase. It’s horrendous.”

Another resident, Zachary Rubin, said the proposed increase is reasonable.

“With this increase, I’ll end up paying about $6 more a month in township property taxes,” he said. “If I can help increase safety in the township with three new police officers and provide good raises to township employees for $6 more a month, I’m satisfied with that.”

Supervisors Chairman Ron Smith said the board started with a proposed increase of 3 mills and worked hard to whittle it down during three budget workshop meetings.

“It’s the best we could do without cutting into basic services,” he said. “I think the increase was necessary and, in return for that, we’re maintaining services at least at current levels and adding new police officers. I think past boards of supervisors have failed to anticipate build out approaching [and resulting decrease in fees] and the drop in realty transfer taxes, and as the result of that nonfeasance we’ve had to take steps to address the shortfall in revenues. The police department has also been understaffed for years, and in that area, too, we’re trying to make up for what past boards failed to do.”

Supervisor Pete Stainthorpe urged township administrators to keep a constant eye on items like police overtime, which will amount to about $200,000 this year, or about $30,000 over budget, according to Fedorchak. He said the public works department, the other major source of overtime, will spend about $45,000 of its budgeted $50,000 for overtime this year, but it could be more if there is a lot more snow and ice before the end of the year.

“I’m not suggesting for half a second they don’t do a good job, but we need to take a hard look at that,” Stainthorpe said of the overtime.

Fedorchak said he and other administrators always try to minimize overtime and will continue that.

“The overall activity level, number of calls and all that, has increased significantly in the community and thus in the police department and that is what drives overtime,” said Fedorchak.

He said projects like a proposed township soccer complex and more work on Memorial Park on Woodside Road are on indefinite hold unless the supervisors approve another bond issue or other revenue sources, like grants, are found.

“There’s no way to finance those things with the revenues available,” said Fedorchak.

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/246-12162007-1457072.html

Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Previous Entries